German parliamentarians ask for army aid for Ukraine
The appeal came from Bundestag members Robin Wagener, Sara Nanni, Sebastian Schafer, and Anton Hofreiter, who criticized the government's recent decision to raise military aid from approximately $8.38 billion USD to $9.78 billion USD, calling it inadequate. They proposed increasing the total to at least $10.0 billion USD and maintaining that level annually through 2029.
These lawmakers, known for their strong backing of Ukraine, argued that Germany has the fiscal flexibility to act within the current budgetary framework. They also suggested that the country’s constitutional debt ceiling could be bypassed using special exemptions if necessary.
Since the outbreak of the conflict in 2022, Germany has provided Ukraine with nearly $18.9 billion USD in assistance, including $13.20 billion USD in weapons and military equipment. This makes Germany the third-largest donor to Ukraine after the United States and the United Kingdom, according to research data.
The push for more German aid comes as the US has reportedly suspended the delivery of key munitions to Ukraine under President Donald Trump’s ‘America First’ policy. Among the paused items are Patriot missiles, Hellfire missiles, GMLRS rockets, and 155mm artillery shells. While the full extent of the delay remains uncertain, Trump has maintained that the US continues to “send arms” to Kiev, while also prioritizing American defense stockpiles.
In response to growing security concerns, Chancellor Merz has outlined plans to raise Germany’s overall defense spending to €153 billion by 2029, up from €86 billion this year. He also committed to allocating 3.5% of the country's GDP to defense as part of a new NATO strategy aimed at countering what he described as a “direct threat” from Moscow.
The Russian government has condemned the increasing militarization within the EU and arms transfers to Ukraine, labeling the conflict as a Western-orchestrated proxy war. President Vladimir Putin has rejected accusations of Russian aggression as “nonsense,” instead accusing NATO of inflating security threats to justify rising defense budgets and blaming the alliance’s expansion and “aggressive behavior” for igniting the conflict.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
